Advanced Steel Construction

Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 1019-1033 (2010)




Jong Wan Hu 1,*, Joonam Park 2, and Roberto T. Leon 3

1 Associate Research Fellow, Office of National R&D Investment Strategy and Analysis, Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning (KISTEP), Seoul, 137-130, South-Korea

2 Senior Researcher, Korea Railroad Research Institute, Ui-Wang City, Kyung-gi, 437-757, South-Korea

3 Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA

*(Corresponding author: E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.; fax number: +82-2-589-2191)

Received: 5 July 2010; Revised: 6 August 2010; Accepted: 23 August 2010




View Article   Export Citation: Plain Text | RIS | Endnote


This paper discusses the design of such composite structures which are based on the advanced methods introduced in the 2005 AISC Specification and the 2005 Seismic Provisions. The 2005 AISC specification explicitly allows the use of the full plastic capacities of concrete-filled tube (CFT) columns for members with slender steel walls and provides substantially larger bending capacities than previous specifications. This study focuses particularly on seismic design following the nonlinear method. The paper begins with an examination of pseudo-elastic design interaction equations and the ductility demand ratios due to combined axial compressive force and bending moment in CFT members. Based on advanced computational simulations for a series of low-rise composite-moment frames, this paper then investigates both building performance and new techniques in an effort to evaluate building damage during a strong earthquake. It is shown that 2 dimensional (2D) equivalent static analyses can provide good design approximations to the force distributions in moment frames subjected to large inelastic lateral loads. Dynamic analyses utilizing strong ground motions generally produce higher strength ratios than those from equivalent static analyses, but on more localized basis. Finally, ductility ratios obtained from nonlinear dynamic analyses are also sufficient to detect which CFT columns undergo significant deformations.



CFT columns; Interaction ratio; Dynamic loads; Ductility; Composite-moment frames; Frame Analyses


[1] Roeder, C.W., “Seismic Behavior of Steel Braced Frame Connections to Composite Columns”, Connections in Steel Structure 4, AISC, 2000, pp. 51-62.

[2] Azizinamini, A. and Schneider, S P., “Moment Connections to Circular Concrete-filled Steel Tube Columns”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 2004, Vol. 130, No. 2, pp. 213-222.

[3] Hajjar, J.F., “Composite Steel and Concrete Structural Systems for Seismic Engineering” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2002, Vol. 58, pp. 703-723.

[4] Hu, J.W., Kang, Y.S., Choi, D.H. and Park, T., “Seismic Design, Performance, and Behavior of Composite-moment Frames with Steel Beam-to-concrete Filled Tube Column Connections”, International Journal of Steel Structures, KSSC, 2010, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 177-191.

[5] Rassati, G.A., Leon, R.T. and Noe, S., “Component Modeling of Partially Restrained Composite Joints under Cyclic and Dynamic Loading”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 2004, Vol. 130, No. 2, pp. 343-351.

[6] Green, T.P., Leon, R.T. and Rassati, G.A., “Bidirectional Tests on Partially Restrained, Composite Beam-column Connections”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 2004, Vol. 130, No. 2, pp. 320-327.

[7] 2005 AISC Specification, “Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-05)”, 2005, Chicago, IL.

[8] 2005 AISC Seismic Provision, “Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 341-05)”, 2005, Chicago, IL.

[9] Mazzoni, S., Mckenna, F. and Fenves, G.L., “OpenSEES Command Language Manual”, Department of Civil Environmental Engineering, 2005, University of California, Berkley, CA.

[10] Varma, A.H. et al., “Seismic Behavior and Design of High-strength Square Concrete-filled Steel Tube Beam Columns” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 2004, Vol. 130, No. 2, pp. 169-179.

[11] Galambos, T.V., “Guide to Stability Design Criteria for Steel Structures, Structural Stability Research Council”, 5th Edition, John Wiley and Sons, 1998, New York, NY.

[12] American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), “Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures” ASCE 7-05, 2005.

[13] American Institute of Steel Contraction (AISC), “Manual of Steel Construction, Load, and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD)”, 3rd Edition, 2001, Chicago, IL.

[14] Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), “State of the Art Report on Systems Performance of Steel Moment Frames Subjected to Earthquake Ground Shaking”, Rep. No. FEMA-355C, 2000, Washington, DC.