Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 195-223 (2009)
GBT AND cFSM: TWO MODAL APPROACHES TO THE
BUCKLING ANALYSIS OF UNBRANCHED THIN-WALLED MEMBERS
S. Ádány 1*, N. Silvestre 2, B.W. Schafer 3 and D. Camotim 2
1 Department of Structural Mechanics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, 1111 Budapest, Mű egyetem rkp. 3, Hungary
2 Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Technical University of Lisbon, ICIST/IST, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049 Lisboa, Portugal
3 Department of Civil Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Latrobe Hall 210, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
*(Corresponding author: E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)
 View Article |
Export Citation:Plain Text | RIS | Endnote |
ABSTRACT
The objective of this paper is to provide (i) the fundamental derivation details and (ii) a comparison between Generalised Beam Theory (GBT) and the constrained Finite Strip Method (cFSM), two alternative modal approaches to analyse the elastic buckling behaviour of unbranched thin-walled members. Thin-walled members may generally buckle in three families (or types) of modes: global, distortional and local (or local-plate) modes. The distinguishing feature of the GBT and cFSM methodologies to obtain buckling solutions is that they can formally separate these three types of buckling modes. An overall comparison of the two methods is provided, including practical aspects, such as the different notations, and theoretical points related to how the displacement fields are either constructed or decomposed into deformation modes akin to the above families. Specific derivation details are provided for both GBT and cFSM, along with numerical examples concerning the buckling behaviour of cold-formed steel lipped channel members under compression and bending. The numerical examples (i) show the power of both GBT and cFSM to separate general stability solutions into pure solutions related to the buckling mode types, (ii) illustrate the use of the identified deformation fields to examine the modal contributions to a buckling solution, and (iii) demonstrate that, in spite of their quite distinct developments, GBT and cFSM modal approaches provide essentially the same extended capabilities for examining and understanding thin-walled member stability. Moreover, considerable attention is also paid to the different handling of the membrane deformations by the two methods, which is responsible for the minor (but fully explainable) discrepancies existing between the results yielded by the two methods.
KEYWORDS
Thin-walled members, buckling analysis, generalised beam theory (GBT), constrained finite strip method (cFSM), deformation modes, local buckling, distortional buckling, global buckling.
REFERENCES
[1] Schardt, R., “Verallgemeinerte Technische Biegetheorie”, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1989, (German).
[2] Camotim, D., Silvestre, N., Gonçalves, R. and Dinis, P.B., “GBT Analysis of Thin-Walled Members: New Formulations and Applications”, Thin-Walled Structures: Recent Advances and Future Trends in Thin-Walled Structures Technology, J. Loughlan (Ed.), Canopus Publishing, Bath, 2004, pp. 137-168.
[3] Camotim, D., Silvestre, N., Gonçalves, R. and Dinis, P.B., “GBT-based Structural Analysis of Thin-walled Members: Overview, Recent Progress and Future Developments”, Advances in Engineering Structures, Mechanics and Construction (SMCD 2006 − Waterloo, 14-17/6), Pandey, M., Xie, W.-C., Chu, L. (Eds.), Springer, pp. 187-204, 2006.
[4] Ádány, S. and Schafer, B.W., “Buckling Mode Decomposition of Single-Branched Open Cross-Section Members via Finite Strip Method: Derivation”, Thin-Walled Structures, 2006, Vol. 44, No. 5, pp. 563-584.
[5] Ádány, S. and Schafer, B.W., “Buckling Mode Decomposition of Single-Branched Open Cross-Section Members via Finite Strip Method: Application and Examples, Thin-Walled Structures, 2006, Vol. 44, No. 5, pp. 585-600.
[6] Ádány, S. and Schafer, B.W., “A Full Modal Decomposition of Thin-Walled, Single-Branched Open Cross-Section Members via the Constrained Finite Strip Method, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 64 (1), pp. 12-29, 2008. (doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2007.04.004).
[7] Ádány, S., Silvestre, N., Schafer, B.W. and Camotim, D., “Buckling Analysis of Unbranched Thin-Walled Members: Generalised Beam Theory and Constrained Finite Strip Method”, Book of Abstracts of III European Conference on Computational Mechanics: Solids, Structures and Coupled Problems in Engineering (III ECCM − Lisboa, 5-9/6), C.A.M. Soares, et al. (Eds.), Springer, Lisboa, 2006, Vol. 679 (Full Paper in CD-ROM Proceedings).
[8] Ádány, S., Silvestre, N., Schafer, B.W. and Camotim, D., “Buckling Analysis of Unbranched Thin-Walled Members Using cFSM and GBT: A Comparative Study”, Proceedings of International Colloquium on Stability and Ductility of Steel Structures (SDSS 2006 − Lisboa, 6-8/9), Camotim, D. Silvestre, N. Dinis, P.B. (Eds.), IST Press, 2006, pp. 205-212.
[9] Ádány, S., Silvestre, N., Schafer, B.W. and Camotim, D., “On the Identification and Characterisation of Local, Distortional and Global Buckling Modes in Thin-Walled Members Using the cFSM and GBT Approaches”, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Steel & Aluminium Structures (ICSAS’07 − Oxford, 24-27/7), Beale, R. (Ed.), 2007. pp. 760-767.
[10] Silvestre, N., “Generalised Beam Theory: New Formulations, Numerical Implementation and Applications, Ph.D. Thesis, IST-Technical University of Lisbon, 2005. (Portuguese)
[11] Cheung, Y.K. and Tham, L.G., The Finite Strip Method, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1998.
[12] Papangelis, J.P. and Hancock, G.J, Cross-Section Analysis and Finite Strip Analysis and Direct Strength Design of Thin-Walled Structures − THIN-WALL (version 2.1), Center for Advanced Structural Analysis, School of Civil and Mining Engineering, University of Sydney, 2005. (Its website is http://www.civil.usyd.edu.au/case/thinwall)
[13] Schafer, B.W., “Elastic Buckling Analysis of Thin-Walled Members (FSM) − CUFSM (Version 2.6), Johns Hopkins University, 2003. (Freely Available at the Website http://www.ce.jhu.edu/bschafer/)
[14] Schafer, B.W., “Elastic Buckling Analysis of Thin-Walled Members (cFSM) − CUFSM (Version 3.12), Johns Hopkins University, 2006. (Freely Available at the Website http://www.ce.jhu.edu/bschafer/)
[15] Schafer, B.W. and Ádány, S., “Buckling Analysis of Cold-Formed Steel Members Using CUFSM: Conventional and Constrained Finite Strip Methods”, Proceedings of 18th International Specialty Conference on Cold-Formed Steel Structures (Orlando, 26-28/10), 2006, LaBoube, R., Yu, W.W. (Eds.), pp. 39-54.
[16] Silvestre, N. and Camotim, D., “Non-Linear Generalised Beam Theory for Cold-Formed Steel Members”, International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 2003, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 461-490.
[17] Mathworks Inc., MATLAB Users Guide (Version 7), Natick, USA, 2005, (http:/www.mathworks.com)
[18] Ádány, S., Silvestre N., Schafer, B.W. and Camotim, D., “Buckling Mode Identification of Thin-Walled Members: A Comparison Between cFSM and GBT Approaches”, Fifth International Conference on Coupled Instabilities in Metal Structures (CIMS 2008 − Sydney, 23-25/6), 2008, pp. 249-256
[19] Ádány, S., “Flexural Buckling of Thin-Walled Columns: Discussion on the Definition and Calculation”, Proceedings of International Colloquium on Stability and Ductility of Steel Structures (SDSS 2006 − Lisboa, 6-8/9), Camotim, D., Silvestre, N., Dinis, P.B. (Eds.), IST Press, pp. 249-258, 2006.