Advanced Steel Construction

Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 283-293 (2015)


EXTENDING THE FATIGUE LIFE OF RIVETED BRIDGES

USING DATA FROM LONG TERM MONITORING

 

Eugen Brühwiler

Civil Engineering Institute, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Station 18, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
(Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

 

DOI:10.18057/IJASC.2015.11.3.3

 

View Article   Export Citation: Plain Text | RIS | Endnote

ABSTRACT

A methodology inherent to existing structures is presented for the fatigue safety verification of riveted bridges. The suggested approach allows for the determination of updated action effects explicitly considering data from long term monitoring. Data from monitoring allow for accurate determination of fatigue relevant stresses in fatigue prone bridge elements, and uncertainties in the determination of updated action effects are reduced. By means of the presented approach, the fatigue safety of a riveted railway bridge of high cultural heritage value was verified after 115 years of service duration. Data from monitoring were exploited by Rainflow analysis and served as the basis for the fatigue safety verification. As the locations of measurements are generally not identical with the cross sections of verification, measured strains were translated to the relevant verification cross section by means of factors that were determined by structural analysis. Sufficient fatigue safety was finally verified for the entire riveted structure and additional service duration of at least 50 years was validated.

 

KEYWORDS

Fatigue safety, Service life, Riveted steel bridge, Fatigue damage accumulation, Structural health monitoring, Examination


REFERENCES

[1] Brühwiler, E., Vogel, T., Lang, T., Lüchinger, P., “Swiss Standards for Existing Structures”, Structural Engineering International, IABSE Zurich, 2012, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 275-280.

[2] SIA 269, “Existing Structures – Bases for Examination and Interventions”, Swiss Society of Engineers and Architects (SIA), Zurich, 2011.

[3] SIA 269/1, “Existing Structures – Actions”, Swiss Society of Engineers and Architects (SIA), Zurich, 2011.

[4] Brühwiler, E., Bosshard, M., Steck, P., Meyer, C., Tschumi, M. and Haldimann, S., “Fatigue Safety Examination of a Riveted Railway Bridge using Data from Long Term Monitoring”, Proceedings, IABSE Conference on Assessment, Upgrading and Refurbishment of Infrastructures, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, May 6 - 8, 2013.

[5] SIA 269/3, “Existing Structures – Steel Structures”, Swiss Society of Engineers and Architects (SIA), Zurich, 2011.

[6] Taras, A. and Greiner, R., “Development and Application of a Fatigue Class Catalogue for Riveted Bridge Components”, Structural Engineering International, IABSE Zurich, 2010, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 91- 103.

[7] Brühwiler, E., Smith, I. and Hirt, M., “Fatigue and Fracture of Riveted Bridge Members” , ASCE J. Struct. Eng., 1990, Vol. 116, No. 1, pp. 198–214.

[8] UIC Code 700, “Classification of Lines and Resulting Load Limits for Wagons”, International Union of Railways, 2004.

[9] Treacy, M. and Brühwiler, E., “Extreme Action Effects in Reinforced Concrete Bridges from Monitoring”, Proceedings, IABSE Conference on Assessment, Upgrading and Refurbishment of Infrastructures, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, May 6 - 8, 2013.