Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 305-321 (2015)
FATIGUE SERVICE LIFE EVALUATION OF EXISTING STEEL AND CONCRETE BRIDGES
Chun-sheng Wang 1,*, Mu-sai Zhai1, Lan Duan1 and Qian Wang1
1 Key Laboratory for Bridge and Tunnel of Shaanxi Province, Chang'an University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China
*(Corresponding author: E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)
DOI:10.18057/IJASC.2015.11.3.5
 View Article |
Export Citation: Plain Text | RIS | Endnote |
ABSTRACT
In recent years, traffic loads and vehicle speeds on both existing steel and concrete bridges have increased to provide fast and sufficient transportation service in China. Chinese government and bridge engineers are paying more attention to the structural fatigue life, service safety, maintenance intervals and the ability to improve capacity of such infrastructure. To study evaluation methods using modern technologies to achieve economical maintenance and extend the sustainable service life, a deterministic evaluation approach was proposed in this paper based on investigation of linear fatigue-damage accumulation theory and fracture mechanics, in which the fatigue failure behaviour of existing steel and concrete bridges was reflected. According to the stochastic fatigue failure mechanism of existing bridges, the member fatigue reliability assessment models were proposed using probabilistic fracture mechanics. Furthermore, based on a Monte-Carlo method, a fatigue reliability analysis program was developed to calculate member fatigue failure probability of existing bridges. The deterministic and probabilistic assessment methods proposed in this paper were applied to evaluate typical existing steel and concrete bridges. According to assessment results, the deterministic and probabilistic remaining fatigue life, safe inspection intervals and maintenance strategies were determined, which can avoid fatigue failure accidents and reduce the life-cycle cost of these bridge structures.
KEYWORDS
Existing steel and concrete bridges, Fracture mechanics, Probabilistic fracture mechanics, Fatigue life evaluation, Maintenance strategy
REFERENCES
[1] Wang, C.S., Chen, A.R., Chen, W.Z. and Xu, Y. “Application of Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics in Evaluation of Existing Riveted Bridges”, Journal of Bridge Structures, 2006, Vol.2, No.4, pp. 223-232.
[2] Wang, C.S., Chen, W.Z. and Chen, A.R., “Fatigue Safety Assessment of Existing Steel Bridges in China”, Structural Engineering International, 2009, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 174-179.
[3] Wang, C.S., Li G., Dong X.H., Hao L. and Wang J.H., “Fatigue Life Evaluation of Existing Highway Reinforced Concrete Bridges”, Proceeding of the 5th International Conference on Maintenance, Safety and Management, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2010, pp.685.
[4] Wang, C.S., Zhou J., Wu Q.Y., Wang Y.J. and Dong X.H., “Fatigue Life and Service Safety Assessment for Existing Concrete Bridges”, China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2012, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 101-107. (in Chinese)
[5] Pijpers, R.J.M., Kolstein, M.H., Romeijn, A. and Bijlaard, F.S.K. “Fatigue Experiments on Very High Strength Steel Base Material and Transverse Butt Welds”, Advanced Steel Construction, 2009, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 14-32.
[6] EN 1993-2, “Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures: Part 2: Steel Bridges”, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, 2006.
[7] Barsom, J.M. and Rolfe, S.T., “Fracture and Fatigue Control in Structures: Applications of Fracture Mechanics, Third Edition”, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, USA, 1999.
[8] British Standards Institution, “Guidance on Methods for Assessing the Acceptability of Flaws in Fusion Welded Structures”, BSI PD 6493, London, UK, 1991.
[9] Newman, J.C. and Raju, I.S., “An Empirical Stress-intensity Factor Equation for the Surface Crack”, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1981, Vol. 15, No.1-2, pp. 185-192.
[10] Hobbacher, A., “Stress Intensity Factors of Welded Joints”, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1993, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 173-182.
[11] China Aerospace Research Institute, “Handbook of Stress Intensity Factor”, Science Press, Beijing, China, 1993. ( in Chinese)
[12] Herwig, A., “Reinforced Concrete Bridges under Increased Railway Traffic Loads”, Ph.D. Thesis, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, 2008.
[13] British Standard Institute, “Guide on Methods for Assessing the Acceptability of Flaws in Metallic Structures”, BS7910, London, UK, 2007.
[14] Zhao, Z.W., Haldar, A. and Breen, JR. F.L., “Fatigue Reliability Evaluation of Steel Bridges”, J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 1994, Vol. 120, No. 5, pp. 1608-1623.
[15] Zhang, R.X. and Mahadevan, S., “Fatigue Reliability Analysis Using Nondestructive Inspection”, J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 2001, Vol.127, No.8, pp. 957-965.
[16] Yazdani, N. and Albrecht, P., “Risk Analysis of Fatigue Failure of Highway Steel Bridges”, J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 1987, Vol. 113, No. 3, pp. 483-500.
[17] Geiβler, K., “Beitrag zur Probabilistischen Berechnung der Restnutzungsdauer Stahlerner Brucken”, Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universitaet Dresden, Dresden, 1995.
[18] Wang, C.S., “Assessment of Remaining Fatigue Life and Service Safety for Riveted Steel Bridges”, Tongji University Press, Shanghai, China, 2007. (in Chinese)
[19] Dibattista, J.D., Adamson D.E.J. and Kulak, G.L., “Fatigue Strength of Riveted Connections”, J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 1998, Vol. 124, No. 7, pp. 792-797.
[20] ECCS, “Recommendations for the Fatigue Design of Steel Structures”. European Convention for Constructional Steelwork, Brussels, Belgium, 1985.
[21] Song, Y.P., “Fatigue Behavior and Design Principle of Concrete Structures”, China Machine Press, Beijing, China, 2006. ( in Chinese)
[22] Ma, L., “Fatigue Performance Study of 1860 MPa Low Relaxation Prestressing Steel Wires”, Railway Standard Design, 2000, Vol. 20, No.5, pp. 21-23. ( in Chinese)
[23] Walker, E.F., Harrison, I.M. and Morley, J., “Fatigue and Corrosion Fatigue of Reinforcement Bars”, Proc. Conf. Underwater Construction Technology, Department of Civil and Structural Engineering Report, University College, Cardiff, 1975.