Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 37-46(2019)
EXPERIMENTAL AND THEORETICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF SPIGOT
CONNECTIONS UNDER CYCLIC LOADING
Mutasim Abdel-Jaber1, Robert G. Beale2, *, Nasim Khalil Shatarat1 and Mutasem A. Shehadeh3
1 Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
2 Visiting Research Fellow, Faculty of Design, Technology and Environment, Oxford Brookes University, Wheatley, Oxford, UK
3 Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
*(Corresponding author: E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.">This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. )
Received: 30 June 2017; Revised: 18 November 2017; Accepted: 11 January 2018
DOI:10.18057/IJASC.2019.15.1.6
 View Article |
Export Citation: Plain Text | RIS | Endnote |
ABSTRACT
Cyclic load tests were conducted on the spigot connections for a system scaffold. Two different connections were tested, one where both ends of a spigot were bolted to tubes and the other where one end was bolted and the other end welded. The tests were conducted by applying a series of different fixed axial loads together with a variable side load which was increased until failure occurred. The objective of undertaking cyclic tests was to not only obtain the rotational stiffness of the connection but also the looseness in the connection as looseness has been shown to reduce the performance of frames, and previous research and experiments involving spigots have ignored these effects. The tests and accompanying finite element calculations showed that the looseness was 0.009 radians for the double bolted spigot and 0.005 radians for the welded connection. The connections proved to be relatively unstable at high axial loads showing considerable scatter in the results. The results were in agreement with the stiffness results obtained by André that for a range of axial loads a single rotational stiffness could be applied but that for low and high axial loads different stiffnesses must be used.
KEYWORDS
Cyclic loading, Spigots, Tubular scaffolds, Failure
REFERENCES
[1] Bragg S.L., “Final report of the Advisory Committee on Falsework”, Her Majesties Stationary Office, London, 1975.
[2] BS 5975, “Code of practice for falsework”, British Standards Institution, London, UK, 1996.
[3] Lightfoot E. and Le Messurier A., “Instabilty of space frames having elasticallyconnected and offset members”. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Space Structures, Guildford, UK, 143-149, 1977.
[4] Lightfoot E. and Oliveto G., “The collapse strength of tubular steel scaffold assemblies”, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 63, 311-329, 1977.
[5] Beale R. G., “Scaffold research – a review”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 98(1), 188-200, 2014.
[6] Beale E. and André J., “Design solutions and innovations in temporary structures”, IGI Global, Hershey, PA, USA, 2017.
[7] BS EN 12811-1:2003, “ Temporary works equipment, Part 1: scaffolds-performance requirements and general design”, British Standards Institution, London, UK, 2003.
[8] BS EN 74-1, “Couplers, spigot pins and baseplates for use in falsework and scaffolds – Part 1: couplers for tubes - requirements and test procedures”, British Standards Institution, London, UK, 2005.
[9] Abdel-Jaber M.S., Beale R.G., Godley M.H.R. and Abdel-Jaber M., “Rotational strength and stiffness of tubular scaffold connectors”, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineering Structures and Buildings, 162, 391-403, 2009.
[10] Prabhakaran U., Beale R.G. and Godley M.H.R.G., “Analysis of scaffolds with connections containing looseness”, Computers and Structures, 89, 1944-1955, 2011.
[11] Cimellaro G.P. and Domaneschi M., “Stability analysis of different types of steel scaffolds”, Engineering Structures, 152, 535-548, 2017.
[12] Sevim B., Bekiroglu S and Arsan G., “Experimental evaluation of tie-bar effects on structural behaviour of suspended scaffold systems”, Advanced Steel Construction - an International Journal, 13, 62-77, 2017.
[13] Peng J.L., Ho C.M., Chan S.L. and Chen W.F., “Stability study on structural systems assembled by system scaffolds”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 137, 135-181, 2017.
[14] Peng J.L, Wang C.S., Wu C.W. and Chen W.F., “Experiment and stability analysis on heavy-duty scaffold systems with top shores”, Advanced Steel Construction - an International Journal, Advanced Steel Construction - an International Journal, 13, 293- 317, 2017.
[15] Liu H., Wen S., Liu Q., Wang G. and Chen Z., “Experimental and theoretical studies on the stability of steel tube-coupler scaffolds with different connection joints”, Engineering Structures, 106, 80-95, 2016.
[16] Milojkovic, “Factors of safety for standard scaffold structures”, PhD Thesis, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK, 1999.
[17] Beale R.G. and Godley M.H.R., “Numerical modelling of tube and fitting access scaffold systems”, Advanced Steel Construction - an International Journal, 2, 199-223, 2006.
[18] Beale R.G. and Godley M.H.R., “The analysis of scaffold structures using LUSAS”, Proceedings of LUSAS 95, Tewkesbury, UK, 10-24, 1995.
[19] Godley M.H.R., Beale R.G. and Feng X., “Rotational stiffnesses of semi-rigid baseplates”, Proceedings of the fourteenth International Speciality Conference on ColdFormed Steel Structures, St. Louis, USA, 323-334, 1998.
[20] BS EN 15512:2009, “Steel static storage systems – adjustable pallet racking systems – principles for structural design”, British Standards Institution, London, UK, 2009.
[21] André J., “Determination of the main parameters affecting the performance of bridge falsework systems”, PhD Thesis, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK, 2014.
[22] André J., Beale R.G. and Baptista A.M., “Experimental and theoretical investigation of Cuplok® Spigot Connections, Proceedings of the eighth International Conference on Steel and Aluminium Structures ICSAS 2016, Hong Kong, 49, 16, 2016.
[23] Chandrangsu T. and Rasmussen K.J.R., “Full-scale tests and advanced structural analysis of formwork assemblies”, Proceedings of the sixth International Conference on Advances in Steel Structures, Hong Kong, 1083-1090, 2009.
[24] Chandrangsu T. and Rasmussen K.J.R., “Structural modelling of support scaffold systems”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 67, 866-875, 2011.
[25] Enright J., Harris R. and Hancock G.J., “Structural stability of braced scaffolding and formwork with spigot joints”, Proceedings of the fifteenth International Speciality Conference on Cold-Formed Steel Structures, Orlando, USA, 357-376, 2000.
[26] BS EN 12811–3:2002, “Temporary structures equipment – Part 3: load testing”, British Standards Institution, London, UK, 2012.
[27] Prabhakaran U., “Nonlinear analysis of scaffolds with semi-rigid connections”, PhD Thesis, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK, 2011.
[28] Blackmore P.A., “The history of wind damage in the UK”, Proceedings of the Conference into Wind Loading on Temporary Structures, Buxton, UK, 17-32, 1994.
[29] National Access and Scaffolding Confederation (NASC), “NASC TG20:13: Guide to Good Practice for Scaffolding with Tubes and Fittings”, London, UK, 2013.
[30] GB/T/1591-2008, “High Strength Low Alloy Structural Steel”, National Standards of the Peoples Republic of China, 2009.
[31] ANSYS, “ANSYS Customer Support”, http/www.ANSYS.com, accessed 26 June 2017.